Rosen has since apologized, but not before receiving her own
share of "scorn" for belittling Romney's family devotion. While liberal
talking heads were spinning Rosen's inanity into a spoof of
Republicans, Democrat strategists ran from her like she'd arrived
at the Baptist picnic toting a bottle of Jack Daniels. Yet Rosen's offense wasn't
her assessment of Ann Romney. Her actual faux pas arose when she said of the
"Republican War on Women":
Well, first, can we just get rid of
this word, “war on women”? The Obama campaign does not use it, President Obama
does not use it—this is something that the Republicans are accusing people of
using, but they’re actually the ones spreading it.
Unintentional error is excusable. But Rosen's false and illogical
opinions weren't unintentional. No rational person believes Republicans would
sabotage their standing with female voters by wrongly accusing themselves of
waging war on women. To accept Rosen's accusation as fact, one must also accept
that Emily's List and
the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee (DCCC) are members of some
vast, right-wing cabal.
Emily's List has issued an endless stream of emails accusing
"ultra-conservatives" of "attacking" the organization's
preferred candidates, predominantly females. In a message dated March 23, 2012 Emily's
List supported electing women to "stop the Republican War on Women in its
tracks." On April 12 Emily's List claimed Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker had
"taken the Republican War on Women and made it his personal crusade."
The DCCC's director, Kathy Ward, issued a short message that mentioned
"war on women" four times, concluding with, "Let's make
Republicans regret they ever launched a War on Women." Even Vice President
Biden, certainly a part of the Obama campaign, said, "I think the 'war on
women' is real."
Sorry Hilary; Republicans didn't create the "War on
Women" theme and everyone knows it, including you.
So the real issue in "Hilary Rosen-gate" wasn't
Rosen's opinion of Ann Romney, as the pontificators have pontificated. It was
her blatant lie. Why would she issue a statement so nonsensical, so fabricated,
so refutable? There's a method to her madness. Rosen knows that large numbers
of liberal voters will accept her story as the unmitigated gospel, never
bothering to recognize or research the truth. Rosen was publicly pandering to a
segment of her party's base.
It only appeared the Democrat Party had tossed Hilary Rosen
under the bus. In baseball terminology she took one for the team. When the
heat's off the Democrat hierarchy will reward her loyalty.
No comments:
Post a Comment